Resolves#3154
## Description:
#2716 introduced nuke cancellation logic on alliance acceptance via
`AllianceRequestReplyExecution`. The radial menu action, though, calls
`AllianceRequestExecution` instead, which accepts the alliance if a
request has already been made by the other player.
This PR moves the nuke cancellation logic to `GameImpl`, hooking into
the `acceptAllianceRequest` method, therefore accounting for every
alliance acceptance, regardless of the specific action that brought to
that.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
deshack_82603
- Replace Webpack with Vite for faster client bundling and HMR.
- Migrate tests from Jest to Vitest and update configuration.
- Update Web Worker instantiation to standard ESM syntax.
- Implement Env utility in `src/core` for safe, hybrid environment
variable access (Vite vs Node).
- Refactor configuration loaders to remove direct `process.env`
dependencies in shared code.
- Update TypeScript environment definitions and project scripts for the
new toolchain.
- Remove the [depracated usage of the
husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky/releases/tag/v9.0.1).
## Description:
migrate build system to Vite and test runner to Vitest & Remove
depracated husky usage
## Please complete the following:
- [X] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [X] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [ ] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [X] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
wraith4081
---------
Co-authored-by: evanpelle <evanpelle@gmail.com>
## Description:
This is a previously approved PR with an additional commit that fixes
case when nations change spawn & jump around, their previous territory
wasn't getting deleted.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
nikolaj_mykola
---------
Co-authored-by: Evan <evanpelle@gmail.com>
## Description:
This PR fixes a critical race condition bug where players could
unintentionally receive the traitor debuff when alliance requests were
accepted mid-attack.
Critical Bug Fixes#1866
**Root Cause:**
Players could bypass UI alliance checks ( isFriendly() ) by accepting
alliances and immediately attacking after that, causing the server to
treat the attack as betrayal
Solution: Added server-side alliance validation in
AttackExecution.init()
This ensures attacks on allies are blocked at the server level.
- Once Bots and Nations decide to attack, they breaks the alliance. I
added maybeConsiderBetrayal(), which currently always returns true. I’ll
add proper logic for alliance-breaking soon on another PR; this didn’t
exist in the code before.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
abodcraft1
---------
Co-authored-by: evanpelle <evanpelle@gmail.com>
## Description:
Don't become traitor when betraying inactive player
This PR makes the following changes
- Do not mark the attacking player as a traitor, if they attack/betray
an ally who is disconnected from the game
- Do not send the attacking player the betrayal message (traitor debuff
applied message), if they attack/betray an ally who is disconnected from
the game
- Add test case for traitor debuff being applied if the attacking player
attacks an ally who is still connected to the game
- Add test case for traitor debuff NOT being applied if the attacking
player attacks an ally who is disconnected from the game
I also tested this manually with nuking an allied player who is
connected and nuking an allied player who is disconnected. The logic
worked as expected.
This PR was made in regards to the following issue: #1599
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I have read and accepted the CLA agreement (only required once).
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
slyty
evanpelle