## Description:
Adds a new `waterNukes` game config option that causes nuclear
detonations to convert land tiles into water instead of just leaving
fallout. When enabled, nuked land tiles are batched and converted to
water each tick, with full terrain metadata updates including:
- Ocean bit propagation from adjacent ocean tiles (BFS flood fill)
- Magnitude recomputation via BFS from remaining coastlines
- Shoreline bit fix-up in a 2-ring neighborhood around converted tiles
- Minimap terrain sync (majority-rule downsampling)
- Throttled water navigation graph rebuild (every 20 ticks) for ship
pathfinding
- Ship executions detect graph rebuilds and refresh their pathfinders
- TransportShips auto-retreat if their destination becomes water
- Water nuke craters use a smoothed angular noise ring with a
bounding-box scan instead of the regular per-tile random coin flip with
BFS, producing clean blob-shaped craters without scattered land pixels
that players would have to boat to individually
The `TerrainLayer` now incrementally repaints tiles that changed terrain
type, and tile update packets encode the terrain byte alongside tile
state so clients can reflect water conversions in real time.
When `waterNukes` is disabled, behavior is unchanged (fallout only).
Includes a new test suite (WaterNukes.test.ts) covering the conversion
pipeline, ocean propagation, magnitude recalculation, shoreline updates,
and minimap sync.
Also adds a new public game modifier for the special rotation.
### The only problem
A bit of lag on impact. But otherwise it works great and is fun. Maybe
needs some followup improvements if it gets merged.
I think its very cool in baikal / four islands team games. Chip away the
territory of your opponents.
Its also fun to turn The Box / Alps into a water map (its actually
possible to boat-trade then)
### Media
Video does not show the updated craters
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aed8bf08-0e94-4484-b997-4de11ae313d9
Updated craters (no tiny islands after impact):
<img width="1920" height="1080" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e896870b-bc9d-493d-8bc8-b3a5427d69d3"
/>
<img width="1472" height="920" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/677065aa-0159-48cd-af44-a91b0f57adfc"
/>
<img width="1296" height="892" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/886ffaba-541f-4e46-97c6-ce963f632fe0"
/>
## Please complete the following:
- [X] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [X] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [X] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [X] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
FloPinguin
## Description:
Perf/fix: listNukeBreakAlliance doesn't ask for allySmallIds and doesn't
do anything with it. But both NukeExecution and
NukeTrajectoryPreviewLayer do fetch and pass allySmallIds to it.
Make allySmallIds optional, have wouldNukeBreakAlliance (which does use
allySmallIds) handle it potentially being undefined, and remove fetch
and pass of allySmallIds to listNukeBreakAlliance.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
tryout33
## Description:
TL;DR: it's faster.
buildableUnits is called via PlayerView.actions from UnitDisplay (each
tick without TileRef), BuildMenu (each tick when open), MainRadialMenu
(each tick when open), PlayerPanel (each tick when open),
StructureIconsLayer (when placing a building from build bar),
NukeTrajectoryPreviewLayer (when placing nuke, on tick when tile
changes), ClientGameRunner (on click to attack/auto-boat or hotkey B or
G).
After https://github.com/openfrontio/OpenFrontIO/pull/3213 got merged,
the change with largest impact in
https://github.com/openfrontio/OpenFrontIO/pull/3193 was done in such a
different way that a new PR was needed
The idea in 3193 was to not always ask for Transport Ship from
buildableUnits. In such a way that very little extra data was send to
the worker. This had the biggest impact on performance (the idea was
months older btw, see
https://github.com/openfrontio/OpenFrontIO/pull/2295). Now, we do it the
other way around, by telling buildableUnits all unit types we want. Or
we want them all (undefined). The downside is more data is send in the
worker message. The upside is we have more options and can add more in
this PR.
This PR implements some of the leftovers in 3193 on top of 3213 and adds
further improvements.
(Some unrelated refactor/perf changes where moved out of this PR and
into already merged
https://github.com/openfrontio/OpenFrontIO/pull/3233,
https://github.com/openfrontio/OpenFrontIO/pull/3234,
https://github.com/openfrontio/OpenFrontIO/pull/3235,
https://github.com/openfrontio/OpenFrontIO/pull/3236,
https://github.com/openfrontio/OpenFrontIO/pull/3237,
https://github.com/openfrontio/OpenFrontIO/pull/3238,
https://github.com/openfrontio/OpenFrontIO/pull/3239)
- **GameRunner**, **WorkerMessages**: _playerActions_ and
_PlayerActionsMessage ._ Option to ask for no buildable units (null). It
now has 3 modes: get all actions and all buildings (units undefined),
get all actions and no buildings (units null), or get all actions and
specific building (units contains Unit Types).
- **GameRunner**: _playerActions_. fixes wrong assumption in PR 3213:
that only if units was undefined, we have to know canAttack.
ClientGameRunner wants to know both, in case of a click on non-bordering
land, to decide if it should auto-boat using a Transport Ship. So units
is not undefined (we only ask for Transport Ship now which has a
positive effect on performance for each click/tap) but we need canAttack
still.
Solved by removing the unit === undefined check before _canAttack_ in
_playerActions_.
- **GameRunner**, **GameView**, **WorkerClient**, **WorkerMessages**,
**Worker.worker**: added _playerBuildables_ / _buildables_ next to
existing _playerActions_ / _actions_. With above solved, there was still
no option to only get buildable units when the actions are not needed.
While **StructureIconsLayer**, **NukeTrajectoryPreviewLayer**,
**BuildMenu** and **UnitDisplay** need only that. To not make
playerActions more convoluted with more params or so, i've added a new
function _playerBuildables_ in **GameView** to only get buildable units
(**GameRunner** _playerBuildables_). _playerBuildables_ has 2 modes: get
all buildings (units undefined) or get specific buildings (units
contains Unit Types). Also update some comments that mentioned .actions
in **NukeTrajectoryPreviewLayer**.
- **ClientGameRunner**, **PlayerPanel**, **BuildMenu**, **UnitDisplay**,
**StructureIconsLayer** and **NukeTrajectoryPreviewLayer**: Since PR
3213, **StructureIconsLayer** and **NukeTrajectoryPreviewLayer** ask for
specific types of units from **GameView** _actions_ (**GameRunner**
playerActions). Now have the other files do the same. For example
**BuildMenu** asks for the new _BuildMenuTypes_ when it calls
._buildables_ and **ClientGameRunner** asks for UnitType.TransportShip
when sending a boat
- **ClientGameRunner**: canBoatAttack now accepts BuildableUnit[]
instead of PlayerActions so we can send it either actions.buildableUnits
or just buildables. Have functions call myPlayer.buildables(tileRef,
[UnitType.TransportShip]) when we only need a buildable unit and no
actions. Or myPlayer.actions(tileRef, null) when we need actions but no
buildable units. Or myPlayer.actions(tileRef, [UnitType.TransportShip])
when we need both actions, like canAttack, and a buildable unit. Then if
needed send either actions.buildableUnits or buildables to to
_canAutoBoat_ / _canBoatAttack_.
- **MainRadialMenu**: needs all player buildable unit types including
Transport Ship, so the _actions_ call argument for unit types can stay
undefined (unchanged) there.
- **MainRadialMenu**: now that **BuildMenu** uses _playerBuildables_
instead of _playerActions_, we must put data in
_this.buildMenu.playerBuildables_. And since we're not putting the
(unneeded) full _actions_ in there anymore, we can now put only the
needed and expected _actions._buildableUnits_ in it.
- **Game**, **PlayerImpl**, **StructureIconsLayer**: Typesafety and some
added perf: new type _PlayerBuildableUnitType_ (see also the below point
for how it is formed). So callers of _buildableUnits_ can never ask for
the wrong type like e.g. UnitType.Train because it doesn't return data
for that type. This type is now used in **PlayerImpl**, **BuildMenu**,
**RadialMenuElements**, **StructureDrawingUtils** and **UnitDisplay**
for that reason. And **InputHandler**, **StructureIconsLayer** and
**UIState** (little more on that in point below).
- **InputHandler**, **StructureIconsLayer**, **UIState**: In order to
make type safety work for GhostUnit.buildableUnit.type too (line ~217 of
StructureIconsLayer), changed type of interface _BuildableUnit_ to
_PlayerBuildableType_. Which is only more accurate. Same for and
this.structures and uiState.ghostStructure and with the latter,
_renderUnitItem_ in **UnitDisplay** and _setGhostStructure_ in
**InputHandler**. All Structures are of PlayerBuildableType (there are
even some in PlayerBuildables that aren't Structures, but it is much
more confined than UnitType).
- **Game**: Typesafety and some added perf: added _BuildMenus_ and
_BuildableAttacks_ in the same fashion that the existing StructureTypes
was already used (simplified it a bit too, with it renamed
_StructureTypes_ to _Structures_ and removed _isStructureType_). They
can be used with .types or .has(). _BuildableAttacks_.has() is used in
**RadialMenuElements**. _BuildableAttacks_ and existing _Structures_ now
make up _BuildMenus_. Which is used in **BuildMenu**,
**StructureIconsLayer** and **UnitDisplay**. Then _BuildMenus_ together
with UnitType.TransportShip make up the _PlayerBuildables_. Which is
used in **PlayerImpl** _buildableUnits_ (see point below). And with
_PlayerBuildableUnits_ we get the new _PlayerBuildableUnitType_ (see
above point on Game / PlayerImpl).
- **RadialMenuElements**: replace non-central ATTACK_UNIT_TYPES in
**RadialMenuElements** with centralized _BuildableAttackTypes_ too. Use
_PlayerBuildableUnitType_ for more type safety (can't by mistake add
UnitType.Train to its build menu). Make use of _BuildableAttackTypes_
instead of adding items hardcoded line by line in _getAllEnabledUnits_,
just like we already did since PR 3239 with _StructureTypes_. And use
_BuildableAttacks.types_ in the same fashion that existing
_isStructureTypes_ (now Structures.types) was already used elsewhere.
- **PlayerImpl**: _buildableUnits_
-- would do Object.values(UnitTypes) on every call. Now for better perf
directly loop over player buildable units by using _PlayerBuildables_
(see above point). In this way we also exclude MIRVWarhead, TradeShip,
Train, SamMissile and Shell so there are less unit types to loop through
by default. Since a player doesn't build those by themselves, they are
only build by Executions which use _canBuild_ directly and not
_buildableUnits_.
-- for more performance, do for loop instead of using .map and .filter,
no intermediate array needed nor callback overhead. We just loop over
the given units (which if undefined will contain _PlayerBuildables_).
Also pre-allocate the results array to get the most out of it, even if
V8 might already be very good at this.
-- cache config, railNetwork and inSpawnPhase so they can be re-used
inside the for loop.
-- cache cost inside the loop
-- it would check twice for tile!==null to decide to call
findUnitToUpgrade and canBuild. Now once.
-- eliminated double/triple checks for the same thing. It called
_findUnitToUpgrade_ (and with that _canUpgradeUnit_) and then _canBuild_
which both check if player has enough gold for the cost of the unit
type. And they both check if the unit type is disabled. Now we call
private functions _canBuildUnitType_, _canUpgradeUnitType_ to first do
checks on unit type level for early returns, and
_findExistingUnitToUpgrade_ to find existing unit without doing anything
extra. in a specific order to check everything only once. The public
functions _findUnitToUpgrade_ and _canBuild_ have an unchanged
functionality and we don't call them from _buildableUnits_ anymore.
-- would get _overlappingRailRoads_ and _computeGhostRailPaths_ when
canBuild was true. But this data is only meant for
**StructureIconsLayer** and it logically only uses it when placing a new
unit, not when upgrading one. Which is also commented on line 351 of
**StructureIconsLayer**. So, we now only get overlapping railroads and
ghost rails if we're not hovering to upgrade an existing unit.
- **PlayerImpl**: _findUnitToUpgrade_: unchanged functionality, but have
it call new private function _findExistingUnitToUpgrade_ to find
existing unit.
- **PlayerImpl**: _canBuild_: unchanged functionality, but have it call
new private function _canBuildUnitType_ to do the checks it first did
itself. And then new private function _canSpawnUnitType_ for the rest of
the checks. This way we can call _canBuildUnitType_ and
_canSpawnUnitType_ from _buildableUnits_ in a specific order to prevent
double/triple checks.
- **PlayerImpl**: _canBuildUnitType_: new private function to be shared
by _buildableUnits_, _canBuild_ and _canUpgradeUnit_ to be able do unit
type level checks in a specific order to prevent double/triple checks.
Via parameter knownCost, _buildableUnits_ can send it the cost it
already fetched so that it doesn't have to be fetched again. For caller
_canUpgradeUnit_, the isAlive() check (which was previously only done in
canBuild) is new but harmless, maybe even better to have also check
isAlive() on upgrade now that Nations are also upgrading which might
prevent some edge case bugs.
- **PlayerImpl**: _canUpgradeUnitType_: new private function to be
shared by _buildableUnits_ and _canUpgradeUnit_ to be able do unit type
level checks in a specific order to prevent double/triple checks.
- **PlayerImpl**: _canSpawnUnitType_: new private function to be shared
by _buildableUnits_ and _canBuildUnit_ to be able do unit type level
checks in a specific order to prevent double/triple checks.
- **PlayerImpl**: _findExistingUnitToUpgrade_: new private function to
be shared by _buildableUnits_ and _findUnitToUpgrade_ to be able do unit
level checks in a specific order to prevent double/triple checks.
- **PlayerImpl**: _isUnitValidToUpgrade_: new private function to be
shared by _buildableUnits_ and _canUpgradeUnit_ to be able do unit level
checks in a specific order to prevent double/triple checks.
- **PlayerImpl.test.ts**: because of the isAlive() check in which is new
for _canUpgradeUnit_ (see above at _canBuildUnitType_), the tests needed
to have the players be alive at the start, in order to pass.
- **BuildMenu**: use .find instead of .filter in canBuildOrUpgrade, a
function we already needed to change. This is faster and prevents an
allocation.
**PERFORMANCE**
As for calling ._buildables_ instead of unnecessarily getting
._actions_, there is an obvious win because there's less to send
calculate and recieve.
Also asking for only the needed buildings helps a lot (especially if
TradeShip isn't needed, see the difference in benchmark in original
#3193).
But the real-world impact is hard to measure. gave it a try in #3193 and
those results should be even better now.
Now testing only _buildableUnits_ performance in a synthetic benchmark,
we get these results. This is after other performance improvments so the
base is already better than it was in original #3193:
**BEFORE** (only buildableUnits itself)
<img width="602" height="96" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7770c0fa-a35e-42fc-90de-1de83242ec23"
/>
**AFTER** (only buildableUnits itself)
<img width="603" height="91" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a1578382-7010-4160-937c-7117bad18beb"
/>
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
tryout33
---------
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
If this PR fixes an issue, link it below. If not, delete these two
lines.
Resolves #(issue number)
## Description:
## PR Title
perf(core): reduce hot-path allocations & safe optimizations
This PR brings in a set of allocation-focused optimizations in core hot
paths
### Scope
- `src/core/execution/NukeExecution.ts`
- `src/core/execution/WarshipExecution.ts`
- `src/core/game/UnitGrid.ts`
- `src/core/game/PlayerImpl.ts`
- `src/core/configuration/DefaultConfig.ts`
- `src/core/execution/SAMLauncherExecution.ts`
### What Changed
- `NukeExecution.detonate`: reduced call overhead/allocations by caching
`mg`/`config`, avoiding repeated lookups, and using allocation-free
loops (no `forEach` closures) in the diminishing-effect pass.
- `WarshipExecution.findTargetUnit`: replaced allocate+sort flow with
single-pass best-target selection.
- `UnitGrid.nearbyUnits`: reduced call overhead and allocations via
single-type fast path and cached query coordinates.
- `PlayerImpl.units`: added fast paths for common small-arity type
queries (1-3 unit types).
- `DefaultConfig.unitInfo`: cached `UnitInfo` objects per `UnitType` to
avoid repeated object/closure creation.
- `SAMLauncherExecution` targeting: removed sort churn and streamlined
target selection with single-pass hydrogen prioritization.
### Rebase
- One conflict was resolved in `NukeExecution.detonate` by keeping
`main`'s diminishing-effect-per-impacted-tile behavior, while retaining
the allocation-reduction refactors.
## Please complete the following:
- [ ] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [ ] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [ ] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [ ] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
DISCORD_USERNAME
## Description:
When a nuke detonates, the explosion is looping over each tiles. Among
other things, it filters the owner units to find the `TransportShips`
units.
This operation is cpu-intensive and repeated over each tiles can make
the tick noticably slower.
On this screenshot the detonation function took 100ms:
<img width="1617" height="488" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/07009b18-4342-4caf-9e82-9ae5147b63f8"
/>
<img width="1645" height="375" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fe9ead87-550a-4166-96ab-092d0c08be82"
/>
I suspect it led to a few frame freeze when I MIRVed too.
Suggestion: loop over the impacted players rather than the tiles.
With this suggestion, the same nuke takes between 4ms to 20ms:
<img width="989" height="365" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/25c0faf0-cc34-41b7-8091-b14bde6db595"
/>
However this changes the death formula used, as they were repeated over
each tiles with ever-smaller values, and with this change the operation
is done all-at-once. This will result in a different outcome.
In my opinion the performance gain is seductive enough to maybe tweak
the formula to make it work with this revised strategy.
What do you think?
## Please complete the following:
- [ ] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [ ] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [ ] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [ ] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
IngloriousTom
## Description:
added sam missile immunity (was missing from the immunity list)
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
w.o.n
## Description:
Nuke trajectory prediction now will show interception with allied SAMs
if the alliance will break on nuke launch.
Code was also refactored to be shared a bit more.
In addition, if an incoming alliance would break if accepted, the nuke
launch will break the alliance.
<img width="1199" height="1002" alt="nukepr"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c31066d9-66cf-4eaa-be3c-e2fbcfe7965a"
/>
## Please complete the following:
- [X] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [X] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [X] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [X] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
bibizu
## Description:
Doesn't need a description :D
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8de576fd-050b-4b35-8526-e4c88d1a9f25https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c99147a1-efdf-426b-96d1-e996e01f89aa
## Please complete the following:
- [X] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [X] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [X] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [X] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
FloPinguin
## Playtest
https://pf-pt-2.openfront.dev/
## Pathfinding Refactor pt. 2
<img width="1536" height="1024" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9477958e-54b7-4c83-b317-ba789e809e9e"
/>
This is a follow-up to a previous PR introducing pathfinding changes.
This time, it introduces a complete refactor of `pathfinding` directory
and breakdown into composable pieces.
### Unified PathFinder interface
`PathFinder<T>` and `SteppingPathFinder<T>` are introduced to unify
**all** pathfinding across the application. First one exposes complete
path, while stepping variant allows the callee to iterate over the path
by calling `.next`. All pathfinders share this one common interface,
which makes them easy to use in any scenario -
`PathFinding.Water(game).search(from, to)`.
`SteppingPathFinder<T>` extends `PathFinder<T>` with an ability to
iterate over the path. It handles caching, storing current index and
invalidation. This allows the units to not care about the inner workings
of the pathfinder and just call `pf.next(current, target)` and receive
instructions on what to do next.
### Common entry point
All pathfinders are now exposed from common `PathFinding` entrypoint:
- `PathFinding.Water`
- `PathFinding.Rail`
- `PathFinding.Stations`
- `PathFinding.Rail`
Additional entry point is introduced for pathfinders which need to work
both in the worker, but also on the frontend, which lacks `Game`
interface. Currently only `UniversalPathFinding.Parabola` is available.
### Spatial Query
New module has been introduced close to `pathfinding` - `SpatialQuery`.
It aims to resolve any questions game may have about finding tiles
meeting criteria. Currently `SpatialQuery.closestShore(player, target)`
and `SpatialQuery.closestShoreByWater(player, target)` are available -
they help answering questions about naval invasion: "What is the best
landing location from user's click?" and "Which our tile should be used
to launch the transport ship?". Under the hood they use very similar
mechanics to pathfinding, so it felt right to put them close by.
### Modular architecture
Pathfinders now support transformers: `MiniMapTransformer`,
`ShoreCoercingTransformer`, `ComponentCheckTransformer`,
`SmoothingTransformer`. Transformers functions like a middleware in the
pathfinding chain. They wrap around the pathfinder and provide
additional functionality. This allows the pathfinder to focus on
actually finding the path instead of doing unrelated things.
Example chain for simple (A*) water pathfinding:
```ts
static WaterSimple(game: Game): SteppingPathFinder<TileRef> {
const miniMap = game.miniMap();
const pf = new AStarWater(miniMap);
return PathFinderBuilder.create(pf)
.wrap((pf) => new ShoreCoercingTransformer(pf, miniMap))
.wrap((pf) => new MiniMapTransformer(pf, game.map(), miniMap))
.buildWithStepper(tileStepperConfig(game));
}
```
The Pathfinder - here `AStarWater` - does not care about the conversion
between minimap and main map tiles. It also does not care if the source
or destination is a land tile. The transformers take care of that. The
pathfinder gets a set of valid coordinates and produces the path -
that's it.
Modular approach makes working on a particular set of utilities much
easier - for example map upscaling is handled consistently across all
pathfinders. Additionally, the pathfinders are not tied to the
particular map resolution used. Pass them a different map and they will
work the same.
### Algorithms
Algorithms used are neatly organized inside
`src/core/pathfinding/algorithms`. They are prefixed with the algorithm
name and suffixed with the use case. File without suffix exposes generic
version ready to traverse any graph with adapters. Specialized versions
either use an adapter or inline logic when performance is critical -
using adapters leads to 20-30% performance loss.
The directory includes `A*` and `BFS` but also other useful utils, such
as `AbstractGraph` used to generate... an abstract graph on top of the
tile map and `ConnectedComponents` helping to identify whether two tiles
are connected by a path without actually computing the path.
### Playground
The playground have been updated with new algorithms, including tweaked
very greedy `A*`.
<img width="2175" height="1424" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1f833651-0024-4299-bf86-882f5368358c"
/>
### Tests
Yeah, there are some, a little too many if I say so myself. But there
are no useless tests. I had to ensure refactored code works somehow
reliably. This PR comes with trust me bro guarantee, but I would
appreciate someone confirming **naval invasions, nukes (esp. MIRV) and
warships**.
### Discord
`moleole`
GL & HF
## Description:
When placing a nuke (Atom Bomb or Hydrogen Bomb), the range circle now
turns red to warn players when the attack would break an alliance.
<img width="456" height="333" alt="Screenshot 2025-12-28 211927"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dfe6f874-3f8b-4662-8877-0af30aa20139"
/>
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
abodcraft1
---------
Co-authored-by: iamlewis <lewismmmm@gmail.com>
Resolves#2434
## Description:
Allows bomb direction to be inverted by pressing a hotkey - currently
"U".
**Check the issue for screenshots / videos.**
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
w.o.n
---------
Co-authored-by: Evan <evanpelle@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: iamlewis <lewismmmm@gmail.com>
## Description:
Removes the check to break alliance after nuke is launched, and alliance
breaking is now determined before tiles are randomly chosen for
destruction. (It is now slightly stricter, I believe, as a weighted
average calculation is a little tricky)
## Please complete the following:
- [X] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [X] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [X] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [X] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
bibizu
## Description:
- Removed the temporary UnitType.Construction and embedded construction
state into real units via isUnderConstruction().
- Centralized non-structure spawning to perform a single validation
right before unit creation/launch.
- Updated UI layers to render construction state without relying on the
removed enum.
- Adjusted and created tests to match the new flow and to cover the
no-refundscenarios.
# Tests updated
- tests/economy/ConstructionGold.test.ts: covers structure cost
deduction and income, tolerant of passive income; ensures no refunds
during construction.
- tests/nukes/HydrogenAndMirv.test.ts: accounts for single-check launch
flow; MIRV test targets a player-owned tile; ensures launch after
payment.
- tests/client/graphics/UILayer.test.ts: mocks now provide
isUnderConstruction and real type strings;
## Please complete the following:
- [X] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [X] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [X] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [X] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
CrackeRR1
---------
Co-authored-by: Evan <evanpelle@gmail.com>
Closes#2071
## Description:
- Created Functional Test for scenario
- Added an alliance revoker function to 'NukeExection'
## Please complete the following:
- [ ] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [ ] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [X] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [X] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
dpop
## Description:
Current SAM behavior is to shoot a missile as soon as a nuke is in
range.
Players can exploit it by overshooting behind the SAM, so the SAM
missile will take way longer to reach the nuke, usually too late to
prevent its explosion.
This PR introduces a "smart" targeting system that allows SAM to
calculate an optimal interception tile along the nuke's trajectory. They
can also preshot before the nuke becomes vulnerable, as long as the
interception tile will be within the vulnerable window.
This change makes SAM range enforcement much more strict.
Changes:
- Nukes now precompute their full trajectory on creation and update
their current position index every tick.
- SAMs use this trajectory data and their own missile speed to calculate
the ideal interception tile.
- SAM missiles now aim directly at that interception point rather than
chasing the nuke.
Small changes on the fly:
- `BezierCurve` now uses a provided increment so the curve LUT is the
optimal size
- Increased nuke opacity when untargetable: 0.4 → 0.5
- Slightly extended nuke vulnerability range to SAMs: 120 → 150
===
Preshot an incoming nuke still in the unfocusable state. Notice how the
nuke is destroyed as soon as becomes focusable:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fbf1ae4-33b4-4fa0-9b53-cb53f3adc17b
Shooting right at the range limit:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d68793ac-b249-45fe-88bf-e20f70758449
Shooting behind the SAM:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/800cd7ff-d9d9-40f3-aba8-fa3ab526b3b2
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I have read and accepted the CLA agreement (only required once).
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
IngloriousTom
## Description:
The troop/worker ratio bar is almost never changed. so remove it and the
entire concept of workers. Now there is just troops.
Now players get a consistent 1k/s gold.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I have read and accepted the CLA agreement (only required once).
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
evan
## Description:
Decreasing MIRV warhead blast radius nerfed them too much, so have them
destroy 95% of population.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I have read and accepted the CLA aggreement (only required once).
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
evan
## Description:
There was a bug where we only checked for betrayals if the target tile
was owned.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I have read and accepted the CLA aggreement (only required once).
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
evan
## Description:
There was a regression on how sam targets nukes.
This fixes it
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
Vivacious Box
## Description:
Set a targetable status for units (specifically atom bomb and hydro)
A nuke is targetable near launch and target but is untargetable mid air.
An untargetable unit is half transparent to show that it cannot be
destroyed.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
Vivacious Box
## Description:
When buildings are stacked on each other, the buildings under are not
redrawn when the stacked building is destroyed.
A simple outer range + sprite radius check triggers a touch which
redraws the buildings.
Sprite radius is set to 16 (dont forget to change it if it ever changes)
### Before:
### After:
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
Vivacious Box
## Description:
Big update to the EventsDisplay
- Style update for EventsDisplay, look & feel similar to other windows
- Component now hidden during spawn phase
- Adds new functionality for filtering events by category. Allows the
player to remove specific event types
- Displays latest gold amount, decays after 5 seconds
<img width="1147" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-07 at 20 18 55"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/11c39818-55ad-4ba1-a998-360057e2856c"
/>
<img width="422" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-07 at 19 01 55"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/09c0b998-6046-49fb-9fba-33b4f57f337b"
/>
<img width="444" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-07 at 20 20 25"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/022deadc-3a49-442a-85f5-f1cd128a5805"
/>
## Please complete the following:
- [X] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [X] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [X] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [X] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [X] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
maxion_
Fixes#1025Fixes#1034
## Description:
Answering issue: #1017
[Cleanup] Pass Player into the execution constructor instead of PlayerID
I have tested the changes running and playing a full game. I do not know
other way to test the changes, please inform me ❤️
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
Lele
---------
Co-authored-by: lva <lva@rovsing.dk>
## Description:
Changed from consolex to console
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
@qqkedsi
## Description:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b46f949a-eb50-4656-8492-216cf820ac46
Add a couple animations for naval combat:
- shell hit
- ship explosion
- ship sinking
Added a simple `Timeline` class to spread FX animations over time.
Added a `ColoredAnimatedSprite` similar to the existing `ColoredSprite`.
Refactored the latter to avoid code duplication.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
IngloriousTom
## Description:
The nukes are setting a `detonationDst` that is never used in UnitImpl.
Without the target tile, SAM launchers ignore the MIRV warheads.
Illustration with 50 SAM vs 2 warhead:
The nuke icon is also staying white while being nuked:
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
IngloriousTom
## Description:
Combine analytics and game types. Simplify and remove redundant player
information.
- Remove ip address.
- Add playerID.
- Combine redundant player tables.
- Move game metadata in to GameEndInfo type, an extension of
GameStartInfo
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Anderson <662325+scottanderson@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description:
Record player stats for the analytics worker to import in to to
postgres. This changes defines a new Analytics schema version, `v0.0.2`,
containing additional metadata about each player.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Description:
* Merged similar fields so they can be reused (eg warshipTarget =>
targetUnit)
* simplified isCooldown api
* added "touch" method to send update to UI layer
* standardized on "undefined"
## Please complete the following:
- [ ] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
<DISCORD USERNAME>
evan
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Refactor**
- Unified and simplified how unit targets and cooldowns are managed
across all unit types, resulting in more consistent in-game behavior for
nukes, warships, trade ships, and SAM launchers.
- Updated naming and logic for unit targeting and cooldowns, improving
clarity in status displays and interactions.
- Reorganized unit interface and streamlined cooldown handling for
smoother gameplay experience.
- **Bug Fixes**
- Corrected visual indicators for nukes and warships to accurately
reflect their targets.
- **Tests**
- Updated automated tests to align with the new cooldown and targeting
logic.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## Description:
- Break alliances on launch based on speculative damage.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
- **Behavior Changes**
- Alliances are now immediately broken when a nuke is launched and its
incoming message is displayed, rather than only at detonation.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Anderson <662325+scottanderson@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description:
Improve type safety and runtime correctness by:
1. Enabling TypeScript's
[strictNullChecks](https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig/#strictNullChecks)
compiler option.
2. Replacing all loose equality operators (`==` and `!=`) with strict
equality operators (`===` and `!==`).
3. Cleaning up of type declarations, null handling logic, and equality
expressions throughout the project.
Currently, the code allows implicit assumptions that `null` and
`undefined` are interchangeable, and relies on type-coercing equality
checks that can introduce subtle bugs. These practices make it difficult
to reason about when values may be absent and hinder the effectiveness
of static analysis.
Migrating to strict null checks and enforcing strict equality
comparisons will clarify intent, reduce bugs, and make the codebase
safer and easier to maintain.
Fixes#466
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Anderson <662325+scottanderson@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: evanpelle <openfrontio@gmail.com>
## Description:
Enables you to click on the `Naval invasion incoming from X` or `X -
atom bomb inbound` messages to focus the camera on the incoming unit
(boat or nuke). Works for boats, atom bombs, hydrogen bombs and MIRVs.
Nothing changes in looks, only the fact that the messages are clickable.
closes#641
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
leo21_
## Description:
Change nuke trajectory to follow a curve, and add a trail behind them.
### Details:
- Use a look-up table to approximate the distance travelled, so the
speed remains constant along the curve
- The nuke speed is higher than a single pixel, so draw a line behind
for the trail
- Added a new "utility" file for the Bresenham/Bezier algorith: please
tell me if that's ok
### Edge cases (literally the edges):
The control points remains in the map so the curve can never go outside:
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
<DISCORD USERNAME>
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Anderson <scottanderson@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description:
By using a type union we get better type safety, enforcing each unit
type have the appropriate params when initializing
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
evan
---------
Co-authored-by: evan <openfrontio@gmail.com>
## Description:
In most cases we do not need to solve for the hypotenuse length and can
do math directly on the square of the hypotenuse. For example, the
common use case for calculating euclidean distance is to check if two
points are within a certain distance of each other. In this case,
`Math.sqrt(x*x + y*y) < d` can be rewritten as `x*x + y*y < d*d`.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
fake.neo
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Anderson <662325+scottanderson@users.noreply.github.com>
changed the sam cooldown to be a general cooldown function and added a
missilesilo cooldown
The function either adds the current tick as the starting point of the
cooldown or sets the cooldown to null and updates the unit. That way
getcooldown function can be used to get back the tick the cooldown was
started and can be compared to the cooldown set in the config.
changed the sam test / added a missilesilo test
---------
Co-authored-by: evanpelle <evanpelle@gmail.com>
FloPinguin