## Description:
### Short path for multi-source HPA*
Math was not mathing, increased the bounds to 260x260, it is a bit
slower but should work better. The short path was breaking when player
owned a lot of shores. This is because the bounding box of tiles with
less than 120 distance + 10 padding could be as big as 260x260 and the
optimized array was set to 140x140. I made mistake of calculating it as
`2 * (60 + 10)` instead of `2 * (120 + 10)`.
### LoS path refinement
Previously, we ran 2 passes of LoS smoothing on the path. However, since
we are effectively tracing the same path, the line of sight is
essentially the same. This PR makes second line of sight stop on water
tiles with magnitude `n + 1` compared to first path. Practically, this
means it'll attempt LoS exactly 1 tile after previous corner. See
screenshot.
<img width="1299" height="1151" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/726be236-1ff8-406c-896a-02902a762ab0"
/>
### SendBoatAttackIntentEvent
The flow of sending transport ships is currently strange. This PR makes
the flow more sane.
**Old flow**
```
- Player clicks TARGET tile, it can be deep inland
- Client asks Worker for the best START tile to TARGET tile
- Worker answers `false`, since the tile is inland
- Client sends BoatAttackIntent with START=false and TARGET tiles set
- Worker accepts BoatAttackIntent, computes DESTINATION as closest shore to TARGET
- Worker re-computes best START to DESTINATION
- Worker sends boat from START to DESTINATION
```
**New flow**
```
- Player clicks TARGET tile, it can be deep inland
- Client sends BoatAttackIntent with TARGET
- Worker accepts BoatAttackIntent, computes DESTINATION as closest shore to TARGET
- Worker computes START as the best tile to DESTINATION
- Worker sends boat from START to DESTINATION
```
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
moleole
## Description:
Resolve discussions about stalled PR
https://github.com/openfrontio/OpenFrontIO/pull/2460
<img width="724" height="348" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c2c9fa79-cace-431a-9ca4-b3656612fa9d"
/>
Changes:
- Added a `Player::canAttackPlayer(other)` function to determine whether
a player can be attacked.
- This function is now used in most places where a fight can occur:
- AttackExecution (land attacks)
- Naval invasion
- Warship fight
- Nukes can't be thrown during the truce
- Immunity only affect human players. Nations and bot will fight as
usual, and can be fought against.
- The immunity timer uses minutes in the modal window.
UI:
- The immunity phase is displayed with a timer bar at the top. This is
from the original PR, to be discussed if it's not deemed visible enough:
<img width="632" height="215" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f5ab9aa0-bd4f-4503-b8d6-b40b121fba65"
/>
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
IngloriousTom
---------
Co-authored-by: newyearnewphil <git@nynp.dev>
## Description:
This is a previously approved PR with an additional commit that fixes
case when nations change spawn & jump around, their previous territory
wasn't getting deleted.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
nikolaj_mykola
---------
Co-authored-by: Evan <evanpelle@gmail.com>
Description:
There is a boating exploit where players could repeatedly send and
retreat boats to effectively increase troop regeneration and maintain
almost double the max troop cap. This PR fixes#2388.
Summary
This pr adds a troop penalty to the boat retreats in
src/core/execution/TransportShipExecution.ts of 25 percent (currently
the same as land attacks, but may require fine tuning). this prevents,
to some degree, the ability to stockpile large amounts of troops above
your max cap.
Testing
I tested the change locally and confirmed that the troop penalty is
applied at the correct times and under the correct conditions, i.e. it
is only applied on successful retreat (applying on reteat initiation may
be confusing if you are told you have lost troops if the transport ship
never arrives anyway). The boating exploit is far less effective with
this fix in place.
Notes
- This is a exploit and does not introduce any new features.
- Existing game behavior outside the retreat penalty remains unchanged.
- The attack message is the same as the land attack, so the translation
should already be present.
Checklist
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
---------
Co-authored-by: Evan <evanpelle@gmail.com>
## Description:
This PR fixes a critical race condition bug where players could
unintentionally receive the traitor debuff when alliance requests were
accepted mid-attack.
Critical Bug Fixes#1866
**Root Cause:**
Players could bypass UI alliance checks ( isFriendly() ) by accepting
alliances and immediately attacking after that, causing the server to
treat the attack as betrayal
Solution: Added server-side alliance validation in
AttackExecution.init()
This ensures attacks on allies are blocked at the server level.
- Once Bots and Nations decide to attack, they breaks the alliance. I
added maybeConsiderBetrayal(), which currently always returns true. I’ll
add proper logic for alliance-breaking soon on another PR; this didn’t
exist in the code before.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
abodcraft1
---------
Co-authored-by: evanpelle <evanpelle@gmail.com>
Problem: attacking a player right before accepting an alliance request
is very effective since the requester can't fight back or reclaim his
territory without canceling the alliance and being penalized with the
traitor debuff.
Change:
- Attacking a player after he requested an alliance automatically
rejects the request
- No changes to existing attacks in both directions, only new attacks
affect the request
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I have read and accepted the CLA agreement (only required once).
regression is found:
IngloriousTom
## Description:
Players received "traitor" debuff when alliances were formed after
attacks started, creating an unfair race condition.
the problem was mentioned here
https://discord.com/channels/1284581928254701718/1399115120486912100
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I have read and accepted the CLA agreement (only required once).
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
Kipstzz
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Anderson <662325+scottanderson@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description:
Remove Cosmetics from PlayerInfo. The game engine should have no
knowledge of cosmetics since they shouldn't affect game play at all.
Instead pass player cosmetics into the GameView.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
evan
## Description:
This is meant to give players more customization options.
Permission handling hasn’t really been implemented yet.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
aotumuri
## Description:
Answering issue: #1017
[Cleanup] Pass Player into the execution constructor instead of PlayerID
I have tested the changes running and playing a full game. I do not know
other way to test the changes, please inform me ❤️
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I process any text displayed to the user through translateText()
and I've added it to the en.json file
- [x] I have added relevant tests to the test directory
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
Lele
---------
Co-authored-by: lva <lva@rovsing.dk>
## Description:
Taken from PR #506
Improve transport source tile by considering border extremums
Only calculate better spawn tile for humans, and have the sender
calculate it and send the src tile in the intent for better performance.
## Please complete the following:
- [x] I have added screenshots for all UI updates
- [x] I confirm I have thoroughly tested these changes and take full
responsibility for any bugs introduced
- [x] I understand that submitting code with bugs that could have been
caught through manual testing blocks releases and new features for all
contributors
## Please put your Discord username so you can be contacted if a bug or
regression is found:
<DISCORD USERNAME>
evan
Co-authored-by: evan <openfrontio@gmail.com>
Arkadiusz Sygulski